Review: Tracy Kidder’s ROUGH SLEEPERS

Review: Tracy Kidder’s ROUGH SLEEPERS

Yesterday was International Overdose Awareness Day. In the afternoon, service providers, volunteers, and elected officials, along with family and friends of victims, all gathered on the New Haven Green to remember those we lost in the last year, most of whom had experienced homelessness at some point in their life.

The relationship between drug use and homelessness is complex. A simplistic assessment might be that the latter is sometimes the result of the former, though, given the trauma of homelessness itself, the former is just as likely (if not more likely) to be the result of the latter. It would be more cautiously accurate to characterize homelessness and drug use as simply parallel circumstances.

In any case, I made the mistake of reading the closing chapters of Tracy Kidder’s book on the community treated by the Boston Healthcare for the Homeless Program when I woke up this morning, with those names recited yesterday still ringing in my ears.

In ROUGH SLEEPERS, Kidder profiles Dr. Jim O’Connell and his journey from bartender to medical student to unwitting founder of a new, experimental pilot program in Boston to provide street medicine. For those who work with unhoused people, particularly in the Northeast, O’Connell is a bit of a folk hero. When I attended a talk he gave at a symposium in New Haven about five years ago (pre-pandemic), I was impressed by his work, but I wouldn’t say my mind was blown. New Haven, after all, has its own version of Dr. Jim and its own street medicine team; as it happened, the Director of the Homeless Health Care Department at New Haven’s Cornell Scott Hill Health Center, Phil Costello, is a disciple of Jim O’Connell’s, so the parallels between the Boston Healthcare for the Homeless Program and Hill Health’s Homeless Health Care Department are hardly surprising.

For me, Kidder’s work filled in the gaps in the history, describing how the program came to be, and following O’Connell over his 35+ year career, right up to the pandemic. But it also elaborated on how the team’s methodology and approach evolved over the years, illustrated through their interactions with a cast of recurring characters — their patients — most notable of whom is “Tony.”

Those who work in this field — i.e., those who work with the rough sleepers — will see streaks of Tony in the people they’ve known over the years. The themes of depression, despair, violence, unpredictable behavior, and gracious love will be all too familiar to frontline workers especially. For that reason alone, ROUGH SLEEPERS can be an incredibly painful read. For outreach workers, expect the last few chapters to be read through the watery haze of tears.

But truly, ROUGH SLEEPERS is worth pushing through. In fact, I would characterize it as “essential reading” for social workers, medical professionals, and (most importantly) anyone in a decision-making position regarding services for unhoused and, especially, unsheltered people. For the first two groups, not all social workers and medical professionals will find themselves primarily working with the homeless population, but the lessons and strategies that O’Connell and his team demonstrate are relevant to anyone who strives for the person-centered approach of “meeting people where they are.”

Moreover, the experienced reader will notice many of the same internal struggles that O’Connell and his team (as well as the author himself) deal with in navigating their relationships with the rough sleepers. In response to the discovery of one patient’s criminal record, O’Connell says, “There are some people on the street who do nasty things to other people, and then I just have a hard time liking them. … But I don’t think we judge — at least I haven’t — we don’t judge people on what led them here. It’s what they do once they’re here.” That’s an incredibly progressive and innovative take for O’Connell’s generation; younger practitioners and service providers, steeped in the values of harm reductionist strategies, would likely go one step further and say, “We simply don’t — or at least, try not to — judge anyone at any time. Period.”

For public officials and executive leadership in hospitals, clinics, shelters, and other services for unhoused people, Kidder offers a critical window into (or maybe for some readers, a reminder) of the seemingly intractable situations and impossible task of providing for people who seem so committed to self-destruction. But, as Kidder implies throughout the book, it is this very perspective — that it’s impossible to help those who won’t help themselves — that the work of the Boston Healthcare for the Homeless team rightly challenges. O’Connell doesn’t shy away from what even he sees as a Sisyphean task — pushing the boulder up the hill only to have it continually roll back down. For him and his team, the struggle is itself important and worthy of their efforts. In our data- and results-driven world, I doubt O’Connell’s bosses would completely agree, and I think, in any U.S. city, you’d have a hard time finding an executive of any kind of service provider for unhoused individuals (let alone an elected official) to consider “improved wellbeing” as an acceptable metric of success. But as Kidder’s interviewees remind the reader again and again, their job is simply to heal one person and one wound at a time — not save the world.

By the end of the book, every word becomes a painful testament to our society’s collective failure to ensure the health and welfare of everyone in our community. Kidder’s reporting implicitly argues that we leave those whom we deem unworthy of compassion out on the street, while praising people like Jim O’Connell as “saints” and “angels without wings.” That praise, laced with private donations, falls far short of the kind of humanity and compassion (backed by real, long-term investment) needed to provide for those who otherwise become the “rough sleepers.” We make excuses for our coldness — because they’re addicts, because they’re crazy, because they’re lazy, because they WANT to be out on the street — but the truth is that we turn our backs because, for all our progress in the last 150 years, we simply don’t want to see or understand those who are different or those who are in pain. Jim O’Connell and his team take the opposite approach. Not only do they strive to offer medical care to those who have been deserted by the broader community, but they open their hearts in every way imaginable so as to offer complete human care to their patients. And, in the end, if their patients become their friends, so be it. They’ll mourn their deaths accordingly.

The Psychology of Space – Trauma Informed Designed and the Healing Power of Buildings

The Psychology of Space – Trauma Informed Designed and the Healing Power of Buildings

This is the case of many people in the unhoused population. This outcome is hopeful as this hypothetical guest decided to stay. Institutional spaces and clinical rooms in their traditional configurations tend to isolate, intimidate and even reject some. Vulnerable populations that frequent soup kitchens and other support services are usually left to deal with these scenarios of stark environmental barriers, having to overcome the sterile spaces around them in addition to dealing with the effects of their current trauma, or be left out altogether.

Trauma-informed Design (TID) is an evidence-based practice guiding a set of strategies ideated to design safe, healing and welcoming environments for specific populations and their staff. It goes beyond aesthetics and recognizes that the quality of a space affects users outlook and mood, tying these to physical and mental health. TID was developed by codifying ways to ease or avoid trauma reactions altogether and establishing goals to provide safety, comfort, community, choice and voice. The solutions may range from relatively superficial material and furnishing selections to the programmatic organization of spaces, their security protocols, lines of sight.

For a person like our hypothetical guest to walk in the door and stay, these spaces need to feel inviting so they can relate to the user and gain their trust to continue down the path to recovery from trauma. These needs vary e.g., previously incarcerated people would prefer wide hallways, lots of natural light and biophilia; while an unhoused person would prefer a feeling of hominess, but not as much biophilia.

With construction well underway at Downtown Evening Soup Kitchen’s (DESK) Resource Center, in New Haven, CT, we see these concepts being put into practice. The TID process became critical to this project. It involved interviewing guests and staff whose previous experiences of space established the priorities and values that drove the design forward – and thus began the healing process. On the first floor dining hall we established clear lines of sight to address physical safety. A soft and warm color palette helps soothe, and different seating options allow for choice between a small table or communal gathering. Durable yet home-like finishes with wood patterns, and noise-absorptive fabric panels softening an existing brick wall were among the most desired features for this space so people could relax and feel welcomed.

The second floor features a new commercial kitchen – where choice is also addressed by offering an expanded range of dietary options- and office space for DESK employees and volunteers, and the third floor will house a small clinic with bathing facilities, a consultation and an exam room for guests to access medical, social work and behavioral staff without having to leave the premises. Also, the basement will house basic supplies like clothing and toiletries, laundry facilities, food storage and access to computers, and some quiet spaces for staff to work in.

The main constraints in this major renovation were a narrow, historic building and an unidentified budget -read non-profit. But well beyond the standard soup kitchen, the DESK Resource Center had an ambitious program and strove beyond funding to achieve a lowbarrier, entry-level facility for individuals who don’t (yet) fit in the system, and those who need to warm up to it and find their way forward. The new environment will provide comfort with a dignified space, while also satisfying basic needs (Maslow) of food, support, and healthcare, and ultimately love and belonging, community and connection -all under one roof.

We, the design professionals, have a great deal of influence and decision-making power; we need to approach our work with curiosity and resist the assumption that we experience the world and the built environment in the same way as those for whom we are designing. With that comes the responsibility to carefully consider our impact through the lens of equality and compassion to develop a world in which buildings will help us heal.

 

Ana Sirota
NCIDQ, WELL AP, Interior Designer
Svigals + Partners