by Steve Werlin | Aug 31, 2024 | Homelessness
Yesterday was International Overdose Awareness Day. In the afternoon, service providers, volunteers, and elected officials, along with family and friends of victims, all gathered on the New Haven Green to remember those we lost in the last year, most of whom had experienced homelessness at some point in their life.
The relationship between drug use and homelessness is complex. A simplistic assessment might be that the latter is sometimes the result of the former, though, given the trauma of homelessness itself, the former is just as likely (if not more likely) to be the result of the latter. It would be more cautiously accurate to characterize homelessness and drug use as simply parallel circumstances.
In any case, I made the mistake of reading the closing chapters of Tracy Kidder’s book on the community treated by the Boston Healthcare for the Homeless Program when I woke up this morning, with those names recited yesterday still ringing in my ears.
In ROUGH SLEEPERS, Kidder profiles Dr. Jim O’Connell and his journey from bartender to medical student to unwitting founder of a new, experimental pilot program in Boston to provide street medicine. For those who work with unhoused people, particularly in the Northeast, O’Connell is a bit of a folk hero. When I attended a talk he gave at a symposium in New Haven about five years ago (pre-pandemic), I was impressed by his work, but I wouldn’t say my mind was blown. New Haven, after all, has its own version of Dr. Jim and its own street medicine team; as it happened, the Director of the Homeless Health Care Department at New Haven’s Cornell Scott Hill Health Center, Phil Costello, is a disciple of Jim O’Connell’s, so the parallels between the Boston Healthcare for the Homeless Program and Hill Health’s Homeless Health Care Department are hardly surprising.
For me, Kidder’s work filled in the gaps in the history, describing how the program came to be, and following O’Connell over his 35+ year career, right up to the pandemic. But it also elaborated on how the team’s methodology and approach evolved over the years, illustrated through their interactions with a cast of recurring characters — their patients — most notable of whom is “Tony.”
Those who work in this field — i.e., those who work with the rough sleepers — will see streaks of Tony in the people they’ve known over the years. The themes of depression, despair, violence, unpredictable behavior, and gracious love will be all too familiar to frontline workers especially. For that reason alone, ROUGH SLEEPERS can be an incredibly painful read. For outreach workers, expect the last few chapters to be read through the watery haze of tears.
But truly, ROUGH SLEEPERS is worth pushing through. In fact, I would characterize it as “essential reading” for social workers, medical professionals, and (most importantly) anyone in a decision-making position regarding services for unhoused and, especially, unsheltered people. For the first two groups, not all social workers and medical professionals will find themselves primarily working with the homeless population, but the lessons and strategies that O’Connell and his team demonstrate are relevant to anyone who strives for the person-centered approach of “meeting people where they are.”
Moreover, the experienced reader will notice many of the same internal struggles that O’Connell and his team (as well as the author himself) deal with in navigating their relationships with the rough sleepers. In response to the discovery of one patient’s criminal record, O’Connell says, “There are some people on the street who do nasty things to other people, and then I just have a hard time liking them. … But I don’t think we judge — at least I haven’t — we don’t judge people on what led them here. It’s what they do once they’re here.” That’s an incredibly progressive and innovative take for O’Connell’s generation; younger practitioners and service providers, steeped in the values of harm reductionist strategies, would likely go one step further and say, “We simply don’t — or at least, try not to — judge anyone at any time. Period.”
For public officials and executive leadership in hospitals, clinics, shelters, and other services for unhoused people, Kidder offers a critical window into (or maybe for some readers, a reminder) of the seemingly intractable situations and impossible task of providing for people who seem so committed to self-destruction. But, as Kidder implies throughout the book, it is this very perspective — that it’s impossible to help those who won’t help themselves — that the work of the Boston Healthcare for the Homeless team rightly challenges. O’Connell doesn’t shy away from what even he sees as a Sisyphean task — pushing the boulder up the hill only to have it continually roll back down. For him and his team, the struggle is itself important and worthy of their efforts. In our data- and results-driven world, I doubt O’Connell’s bosses would completely agree, and I think, in any U.S. city, you’d have a hard time finding an executive of any kind of service provider for unhoused individuals (let alone an elected official) to consider “improved wellbeing” as an acceptable metric of success. But as Kidder’s interviewees remind the reader again and again, their job is simply to heal one person and one wound at a time — not save the world.
By the end of the book, every word becomes a painful testament to our society’s collective failure to ensure the health and welfare of everyone in our community. Kidder’s reporting implicitly argues that we leave those whom we deem unworthy of compassion out on the street, while praising people like Jim O’Connell as “saints” and “angels without wings.” That praise, laced with private donations, falls far short of the kind of humanity and compassion (backed by real, long-term investment) needed to provide for those who otherwise become the “rough sleepers.” We make excuses for our coldness — because they’re addicts, because they’re crazy, because they’re lazy, because they WANT to be out on the street — but the truth is that we turn our backs because, for all our progress in the last 150 years, we simply don’t want to see or understand those who are different or those who are in pain. Jim O’Connell and his team take the opposite approach. Not only do they strive to offer medical care to those who have been deserted by the broader community, but they open their hearts in every way imaginable so as to offer complete human care to their patients. And, in the end, if their patients become their friends, so be it. They’ll mourn their deaths accordingly.
by Steve Werlin | Jul 11, 2024 | Advocacy, Homelessness, In the News
I’ve included below two articles on the Grants Pass decision, as well as an opinion piece from Sarah Fox, executive director at Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness. To add to these perspectives, I’ll note that this ruling is a sad commentary on where we are as a nation. This court’s decision absolves the government (at all levels) from their responsibility to ensure basic needs for those residing within our borders, while also promoting an enforcement approach over a results-driven and solutions-oriented strategy of compassion. Empowering municipalities to sweep people away from wherever those municipalities so choose is not merely counterproductive: it puts people at even greater risk of adverse, even deadly, health outcomes, while disconnecting them from essential services and therefore reducing the likelihood of getting them successfully housed. Like the War on Drugs, encampment clearing is a demonstrably failed policy that exacerbates the public health crisis.
What we’re facing in Connecticut
CT advocates decry barriers for unhoused with health needs: ‘A life and death public health crisis’ . . .
By: Cris Villalonga- Vivoni, Staff Writer – New Haven Register
Connecticut’s unhoused population continues to rise as affordable housing options decrease, an already difficult situation exacerbated for people with medical needs that add challenges to finding housing, officials said.
“We are seeing an increase in homelessness not only in New Haven but across the state,” said Margaret LeFever, senior manager of the coordinated access network, or CAN, at the United Way of Greater New Haven. “We desperately need more deeply affordable housing to keep people in housing and be able to house those experiencing homelessness as quickly as possible. It is a life and death public health crisis.”
National studies have found that homelessness is associated with higher prevalence of chronic conditions, mental illness and substance use disorder. Being unhoused while also living with a complex medical condition, such as a chronic illness, heightens their risk of death if they remain homeless. Read more . . .
Connecticut after Grants Pass v. Johnson
What can Connecticut expect after the Supreme Court’s decision on evicting homeless encampments?
By Mark Zaretsky, Staff Writer – New Haven Register
A U.S. Supreme Court decision that found cities have broad power to evict people from encampments and confiscate their property is unlikely to affect life for unhoused people in Connecticut, local advocates and government officials across the state said.
But the June 28 ruling — which affects more than 650,000 people experiencing homelessness, according to the federal government — represents a new low for a government that should be doing everything it can to help people who need it, not criminalize them for being poor or mentally ill, several advocates said.
“It really gets to me that they’re treating homelessness as a crime rather than a condition,” said the Rev. Sara Smith, who has spent 15 years fighting homelessness in Bridgeport.
The controversial ruling overturned a California-based appeals court’s previous ruling in a case involving Grants Pass, a city of 39,000 in southwest Oregon that has just one homeless shelter. It cleared the way for cities to enforce bans on unhoused people sleeping outside in public places. Read more . . .
Opinion: Arresting people is not the solution to homelessness
By Sarah Fox, Chief Executive Officer, Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness
The solution to hunger is food, and the solution to homelessness is homes. The solution is emphatically not arresting people who sleep outside when they have nowhere else to go.
The June 30 Supreme Court decision, City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, says that people who are unhoused can be arrested for resting outside, pushing efforts to solve homelessness a giant step back.
The decision will have nationwide impact by giving cities and states the right to punish people for sleeping outdoors. We know that this will harm unhoused community members and subject people to violence, destruction of personal property, and adverse health outcomes, in addition to saddling them with unneeded fines.
For years, Connecticut has been at the forefront in solving homelessness. Through a multitude of governors and presidential administrations, the Nutmeg State has made incredible strides to find permanent housing for all its residents. Read more . . .
by Steve Werlin | Feb 5, 2024 | Drop-in Center, Food Pantry, In the News
Downtown Evening Soup Kitchen, Inc. (DESK), kicked off the renovations to their Drop-in & Resource Center at 266 State Street today with a “wall-breaking ceremony,” featuring Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro and Mayor Justin Elicker. The celebration marked the start of a much-anticipated capital project to renovate DESK’s facilities, where unhoused individuals are connected to a variety of services.
The conceptual design of the project began in 2019-20 with a series of interviews, focus groups, and a half-day workshop that brought together people with lived expertise, providers, volunteers, community stakeholders, law enforcement, and City officials. A major step toward the goal of creating New Haven’s first low-barrier, Downtown Drop-in & Resource Center (DRC) was realized in December 2020 when DESK purchased the three-story building at 266 State Street. The following April, DESK launched the DRC as a day program, open 1:30-5:30, Sunday through Friday—all the while, working in the background to acquire the funding, design the architectural plans, and plan for the renovations.
The 266 State Capital Project is a $3.875 million construction project funded by a combination of public and private sources, including $1.438 million in federal HUD Community Project Funding, $500,000 from the state Community Investment Fund, $200,000 in state ARPA funding, $150,000 in City of New Haven CDBG funding, $150,000 from Cornell Scott Hill Health Center (medical clinic underwriting), $114,000 from Connecticut Foodshare, $100,000 from Yale New Haven Health Systems, and $100,000 from Yale University. In addition to these institutional funders, dozens of private individuals have contributed to the project. Over the coming seven months, as the construction is underway, DESK will raise the remaining 15 percent of the funding through private sources.
While addressing the crowd in attendance, Mayor Justin Elicker stated, “We have a crisis right now with housing across the nation, across the state, and in our city. That is something that people in this room know all too much. Groups like DESK not only partnered with us along the way but also pushed us to think differently about how to provide services.” Once completed, the new Drop-in & Resource Center will include a modern, energy-efficient commercial kitchen, additional office space for program staff, a full medical clinic (staffed by Cornell Scott Hill Health Center’s Homeless Healthcare Department), and additional consultation and meeting space for partnering agencies.
“Just as we’re doing literally today, this is a program that breaks down walls,” said Steve Werlin, DESK’s Executive Director. “This is a place of connection, where people in need build trust and relationships that lead to both basic, life-saving needs, as well as support services that improve overall quality of life.”
Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro was on hand to deliver the initial “break in the wall,” donning a hardhat and swinging a heavy mallet. “Over the years, [DESK has] grown to respond to the increase and the need with more complex services that people need—progressive strategies and empathetic approaches.,” she said.
While construction continues, DESK will operate its Drop-in & Resource Center program in the basement of the Church of St. Paul & St. James at 57 Olive Street, with the same schedule (Sunday-Friday, 1:30-5:30 pm).
The project’s architect is Ninth Square-based Svigals + Partners, lauded for their trauma-informed designs of New Haven’s Ronald McDonald House and the Sandy Hook School redesign. Doug Lovgren explains that “SVIGALS + Partners is delighted to support DESK in its important mission to support unhoused individuals in our city, and that the firm’s mission is to utilize architecture and design to support our community.” Construction is being overseen by PAC Group, known for a variety of healthcare and clinical facility projects across Connecticut.
More information on the 266 State Capital Project, including the architectural plans, funders, capital campaign committee members, and how to support this critical work can be found at deskct.org/capital.
About Downtown Evening Soup Kitchen:
Founded in 1987, DESK is a New Haven-based, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that serves people experiencing homelessness or living in poverty by providing food assistance and services that promote health, community, and equity. Each year, DESK serves more than 4,000 people through a nightly dinner program, a weekly food pantry, and New Haven’s only low-barrier, Downtown Drop-in & Resource Center for unhoused people. More information can be found at www.deskct.org.
You can also find media coverage of this announcement at WTNH, New Haven Independent, New Haven Register, and Yale Daily News.